• +86 18365346828
  • Pudong Disctirct, Shanghai, China
Patents Assigned To Buckeye Steel Castings - Justia

Freight car trucks of the 20th Century | Model Railroad ...

The first patent issued for what we now know as the "u" or channel section truss was assigned to Buckeye Steel Casting Co. in 1914. Symington Co. patented the double truss design in the late 1920s. For a clearer example of the double truss feature and a comprehensive chapter on freight car trucks see Martin R Karig III's book "Coal Cars, The ...

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ... - Justia …

Amsted Indus. Inc. v. Buckeye Steel Castings Co., 24 F.3d 178, 187 (Fed. Cir. 1994). The notice The notice “must be sufficiently specific to support an objective understanding that the recipient may be an

Cases and Materials on Patent Law | Martin Adelman ...

patent act 163. infringer 162 . Post a Review . You can write a book review and share your experiences. Other readers will always be interested in your opinion of the books you've read. Whether you've loved the book or not, if you give your honest and detailed thoughts then people will find new books that are right for them. Free ebooks since ...

Agencies - Justia Regulation Tracker

Dec 04, 2006· Justia Regulation Tracker Environmental Protection Agency Recent Posting to the Applicability Determination Index (ADI) Database System of Agency Applicability Determinations, Alternative Monitoring Decisions, and Regulatory Interpretations Pertaining to Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, and the …

Janney Coupler Resource | Learn About, Share and Discuss ...

This resulted in the sharing of U.S. Patent improvements and agreed to by The National Malleable Castings Company, Henry Pope President; The Buckeye Steel Castings Company, The Gould Coupler Company, American Steel Foundries and The Monarch Steel Castings Company, and to be the active standard M.C.B. D Type forward from January 1, 1918.

Adrea v. Barnes & Noble: Court Holds ... - Patent Lawyer Blog

Jul 16, 2014· Amsted Indus. Inc. v. Buckeye Steel Castings Co., 24 F.3d 178, 187 (Fed. Cir. 1994). Adrea’s communications with defendants in October of 2010 cannot reasonably constitute communication of a specific charge against a specific device, given that the communication mentioned no charge, no device, and indeed, no patent.”

B&O Museum Yard & Shop - www.rgusrail.com

Above, the tender was a cast steel water bottom design, with a capacity of 30 tons of coal and 21,000 gallons of water. It rode on two Buckeye Steel Casting Company six wheel tender trucks. As well as #2705, eleven other "Kanawhas" have survived.

Amsted Industries Incorporated, Plaintiff ... - Justia Law

Buckeye Steel Castings Company appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered in favor of Amsted Industries Incorporated pursuant to jury verdicts that Buckeye willfully infringed Amsted's U.S. Patent 3,664,269 and that Amsted is entitled to damages in the amount of $1,497,232, Amsted Indus. Inc. v. Buckeye Steel Castings Co.,

Patent Infringement Blog: January 2018

Contrary to [defendant's] contention, [Amsted Indus. Inc. v. Buckeye Steel Castings Co., 24 F.3d 178, 187 (Fed. Cir. 1993)] . . . did not hold that Section 287(a) is not satisfied when the patentee notifies an alleged infringer of a 'type of product' that the patentee believes to infringe its patent. Rather, the letter that the Federal Circuit ...

Spring tab shim support in rotary shank coupler - Buckeye ...

Oct 19, 1999· Buckeye Steel Castings Company (Columbus, OH) ... 1986 to Carl McClurg and originally assigned to Buckeye International, Inc. of Columbus, Ohio. As exemplied by and shown in this patent, rotary dump cars have long been in use as railroad cars. The cars may be positioned over dump sites and rotated about the longitudinal axes of aligned couplers ...

Von Holdt v. A-1 Tool Corp., 714 F. Supp. 2d 863 ...

May 17, 2010· Amsted Indus. Inc. v. Buckeye Steel Castings Co., 24 F.3d 178, 187 (Fed.Cir.1994). Actual notice is satisfied when the patentee informs the alleged infringer of "the identity of the patent and the activity that is believed to be an infringement, accompanied by a proposal to abate the infringement, whether by license or otherwise." SRI Int'l v.

Patent Happenings - October 2008, Latimer, Mayberry and ...

[21] Amsted Indus. Inc. v. Buckeye Steel Castings Co., 24 F.3d 178, 186 (Fed. Cir. 1994). [22] The Federal Circuit also vacated the damage award because the district court had reduced the jury s damages award without giving the patentee the option of a new trial on damages.

Janney coupler - Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core

This resulted in the sharing of U.S. Patent improvements and agreed to by The National Malleable Castings Company, Henry Pope President; The Buckeye Steel Castings Company, The Gould Coupler Company, American Steel Foundries and The Monarch Steel Castings Company, and to be the active standard M.C.B. D Type forward from January 1, 1918.

Amsted Industries Incorporated, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant ...

1. Buckeye Steel Castings Company appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered in favor of Amsted Industries Incorporated pursuant to jury verdicts that Buckeye willfully infringed Amsted's U.S. Patent 3,664,269 and that Amsted is entitled to damages in the amount of $1,497,232, Amsted Indus. Inc. v. Buckeye Steel Castings Co.,

US4595109A - Coupler for rotary dump cars - Google Patents

1986-06-17 Publication of US4595109A publication Critical patent/US4595109A/en 1990-02-16 Assigned to BUCKEYE STEEL CASTINGS COMPANY reassignment BUCKEYE STEEL CASTINGS COMPANY CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). EFFECTIVE DATE: 1-1-86 - OH Assignors: BUCKEYE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Full text of "A History of the Activities of the Ohio ...

An icon used to represent a menu that can be toggled by interacting with this icon.

Janney coupler - mrsdhyt.blogspot.com

This resulted in the sharing of U.S. Patent improvements and agreed to by The National Malleable Castings Company, Henry Pope President; The Buckeye Steel Castings Company, The Gould Coupler Company, American Steel Foundries and The Monarch Steel Castings Company, and to be the active standard M.C.B. D Type forward from January 1, 1918.

Janney coupler - WikiMili, The Best Wikipedia Reader

Jul 20, 2020· This resulted in the sharing of U.S. Patent improvements and agreed to by The National Malleable Castings Company, Henry Pope President; The Buckeye Steel Castings Company, The Gould Coupler Company, American Steel Foundries and The Monarch Steel Castings Company, and to be the active standard M.C.B. D Type forward from January 1, 1918.

February | 2020 | HDP Patents Blog

The Federal Circuit made quick work of Arctic ’s second argument — that the finding of willfulness dispensed with the need to show notice — pointing out that in In Amsted Indus. Inc. v. Buckeye Steel Castings Co. it held that the determination whether a patentee provided actual notice under § 287 “must focus on the action of the ...

SRI v. ATL |

Patent Litig., 982 F.2d 1527, 1544, 25 USPQ2d 1241, 1254 (Fed.Cir.1992). ... 1690-91 (Fed.Cir.1996); Amsted Indus., Inc. v. Buckeye Steel Castings Co., 24 F.3d 178, 183, 30 USPQ2d 1462, 1466 (Fed.Cir.1994). Thus appellate review is conducted on the criteria of abuse of discretion; that is, whether the decision to enhance damages and the amount ...

Janney coupler — Wikipedia Republished // WIKI 2

This resulted in the sharing of U.S. Patent improvements and agreed to by The National Malleable Castings Company, Henry Pope President; The Buckeye Steel Castings Company, The Gould Coupler Company, American Steel Foundries and The Monarch Steel Castings Company, and to be the active standard M.C.B. D Type forward from January 1, 1918.

US5947031A - Google Patents

1997-10-07 Application filed by Buckeye Steel Castings Co filed Critical Buckeye Steel Castings Co 1997-10-07 Priority to US08/946,276 priority Critical patent/US5947031A/en 1998-03-30 Assigned to BUCKEYE STEEL CASTINGS CO. reassignment BUCKEYE STEEL CASTINGS CO. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: POLLEY ...

AMSTED INDUSTRIES v. BUCKEYE STEEL CASTINGS | 24 F.3d 178 ...

LOURIE, Circuit Judge. Buckeye Steel Castings Company appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois entered in favor of Amsted Industries Incorporated pursuant to jury verdicts that Buckeye willfully infringed Amsted's U.S. Patent 3,664,269 and that Amsted is entitled to damages in the amount of $1,497,232, Amsted Indus. Inc. v. Buckeye ...

156 F3d 1182 Comark Communications Inc v. Harris ...

See Amsted Indus., Inc. v. Buckeye Steel Castings Co., 24 F.3d 178, 183, 30 USPQ2d 1462, 1466 (Fed.Cir.1994) ("It is within the province of the jury to determine the credibility of a witness and the weight to be given his testimony; the jury is not required to accept testimony as true, even if it is uncontradicted.");

US6089165A - patents.google.com

1998-03-24 Application filed by Buckeye Steel Castings Co filed Critical Buckeye Steel Castings Co 1998-03-24 Priority to US09/047,746 priority Critical patent/US6089165A/en 1998-11-24 Assigned to BUCKEYE STEEL CASTINGS reassignment BUCKEYE STEEL CASTINGS ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS).

127 F3d 1462 Sri International Inc v. Advanced Technology ...

See National Presto Indus. Inc. v. West Bend Co., 76 F.3d 1185, 1193-94, 37 USPQ2d 1685, 1690-91 (Fed.Cir.1996); Amsted Indus., Inc. v. Buckeye Steel Castings Co., 24 F.3d 178, 183, 30 USPQ2d 1462, 1466 (Fed.Cir.1994). Thus appellate review is conducted on the criteria of abuse of discretion; that is, whether the decision to enhance damages and ...

SRI INT'L v. ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY LAB | 127 F.3d 1462 | Fed ...

The patent is assigned to [SRI] and nonexclusive licenses are extant. SRI would be pleased to provide [ATL] with a nonexclusive license under the patent. For your information, counterpart applications are on file in a number of countries outside the United States. ... (Fed. Cir. 1996); Amsted Indus., Inc. v. Buckeye Steel Castings Co., 24 F.3d ...

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1) A TO ... - …

infringement by a specific accused product or device.” Amsted Indus. Inc., Buckeye Steel Castings Co. , 24 F.3d 178, 187 (Fed. Cir. 1994). Obtain ing a copy of the patent alone is not actual notice; rather, the patentee must give notice of the patent and infringement. Voda v. Cordis Corp. , No.

Integral Frame Steam Locomotives - The Home Machinist!

Oct 22, 2007· The one piece bed was developed by Commonwealth Steel Co. of Granite City, IL, in the mid-20s. While many patents were issued to separate Commonwealth personnel, it is generally acknowledged that Commonwealth co-founder and, later, General Steel Castings VP, Harry Pflager held the original patents on the cast bed.

SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First ... - Justia Law

Buckeye Steel Castings Co., 963 F. 2d 360, 363, n. 3 (CA Fed. 1992) (Section 286 “is not, strictly speaking, a statute of limitations”); Standard Oil Co. v. Nippon Shokubai Kagaku Co., Ltd. , 754 F. 2d 345, 348 (CA Fed. 1985) (“[Section] 286 cannot properly be called a ‘statute of limitations’ in the sense that it defeats the right to ...

Hotline

+86 18365346828

Address

Pudong Disctirct, Shanghai, China

Mobile Phone

+86 18365346828